Sometimes, those ridiculous threats warrant an equally ridiculous response.
Bagels, anyone? [Ed: “Liable Per Se”? What’s that?]
Read more here: http://www.philadelinquency.com/2014/08/01/pdq-receives-lolsuit-threat-legal-dept-responds/
Philly Law Blog
Represent.
YOU MUST READ THIS
Disclaimer
You should build a turtle fence.2012 ABA Blawg 100 Honoree
2013 ABA Blawg 100 Honoree
Subscribe
Blogroll
- A Fool in the Forest
- A Public Defender
- Above the Law
- Adam Steinbaugh's Blog About Law and Technology
- Allergic to Bull
- Am I Free To Go Now?
- Associate's Mind
- bannination.com
- Crime & Federalism
- Criminal Justice Section – Philadelphia Bar Association
- Danger and Play
- David F. Sugerman
- Defending People
- Die Troll Die
- Fight Copyright Trolls
- fishtown.us
- Gamso – For the Defense
- Glomarization, Esq.
- Hercules and the Umpire
- Houston Lawyer Blog (Rob Cashman)
- Jamison Koehler Law Blog
- JD Underground
- Lawyerist
- Legal Satyricon
- Litigation and Trial
- My Law License
- My Shingle
- New Jersey Lawyers Blog (Boris Peyzner)
- New York Personal Injury Law Blog
- Not Guilty, No Way
- Overlawyered
- Patterico's Pontifications
- Philadelinquency
- Philadelphia Will Do
- PhiLAWdelphia
- Popehat
- Rick Horowitz Criminal Defense Blog
- Simple Justice
- Slepner Law Blog
- Tax Girl (Kelly Erb)
- Tempe Criminal Defense Blog
- The Fraud Files Blog
- The Philadelphia Lawyer
- The Salty Droid
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Trial Warrior Blog
- Unwashed Advocate
- Veggie Vixen
- Virtual Law Practice (Stephanie Kimbro)
Archives
- March 2020
- November 2019
- March 2019
- October 2018
- November 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- June 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
Resources
Blog Not Endorsed
This blog is not endorsed by or affiliated with any organization, including those above. The links go to stuff we like or think are good resources. However, they might not feel the same way about us. By linking to something or putting a graphic on the side, it does not mean that organization agrees with our content, vouches for the accuracy of our content, or is affiliated with this blog or its contributors in any way. Sadly, sometimes love goes unrequited.
In your reply letter, you offer: If Ms. Francis writes Mr. Sawyer and “politely ask[s] [Mr. Sawyer] to take down the posts, along with two dozen New York bagels,” Mr. Sawyer “will take [down the posts].”
Although meant as dry humor, you are bound by your offer. I cannot wait for your receipt of two dozen New York bagels – New York bagels as stale or soggy as your humor – because stale, soggy, or fresh, the law requires that you then “take [down the posts].” And who gets the last laugh (hint: not the person munching stale, soggy, or fresh New York bagels).
We have soft pretzels here; so who gets the last laugh?
Leo — also, e pluribus unum, ipso facto, fee tail, and U.C.C. 2-207(1)-(3)! I sure do hope you know what you’re doing!
NICE…. You gotta LOVE this stuff …..Can I bring the cream cheese (Philly Cream Cheese of Course) or would you like your Bagels with with LOX cucumbers tomatoes and lettuce but NO onion and Philly Cream Cheeses … OH and what about the New York Cheese Cake for dessert …….. Jerry @ Lawyer Up Philly.com
[…] This is what happens when a Fishtown lawyer negotiates a deal. […]
I’m confused. I get that you were trying to be funny, but at the end of the day your client ends up doing something they’re apparently not legally obligated to do… for bagels. Why not money? Money can be used to buy many bagels. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQpc0QfBaMc
Bwuahahahahaha!!!!!
Points to her lawyer for the variation on “govern yourself accordingly”.
Also, mind if I ask why First Amendment Bad Ass Randazza was CCd?
Marco also represents the blog. He is my co-counsel.
Well…this is amazing.
Well? Were you bageled or not?
Pretty ridiculous! reminds me of all these celebrity Twitter lawsuits lol