Should I run my law firm on Apple? (a stupid post Greenfield and Tannebaum will laugh at)

A question I get from time to time is “Should I run my law practice on Apple or PC?”

The answer? Like all things, it depends. Our practice is run almost solely in Apple technology.

I preface this with a thought… this is a stupid post. If you’re considering starting a law practice,Β start here, and maybeΒ read this. The choice to use Apple or PC isn’t all that important in the grand scheme of things. Whatever direction you choose won’t have all that much of a bearing on your practice. It’s like asking if you prefer to eat eggs for breakfast or cereal. It’s a preference. It won’t win the trial or make you lots of money anymore than your Fruit Loops will. (Actually, your choice of breakfast may have an impact on your effectiveness at trial. Your choice of Apple products, not so much.)

That out of the way, these are my musings about running a law practice on Apple…

The advantages of running your practice on Apple.

1. It just works. Apple has done a fabulous job integrating technology like Dropbox and Google Apps. My calendar, email, and Dropbox isΒ syncedΒ seamlessly with my iPhone and my iPad. I can access just about every element of my practice from my phone or iPad. Calendar, client file, you name it. It’s at my fingertips. Acrobat Professional, Dropbox, and Google Apps all feel like they are native to Mac.

2. Seamless PDFΒ integration. “Print to PDF” is also integrated into OSX. This means you can draft a document in whatever format and easily convert it to a PDF.

3. Apps are cheap, and many of the best ones are free. Mail, Calendar, and most other programs are native to iOS. Pages, Mac’s word processor, costs about $20. Comparatively, MS Office is quite expensive. (though you can use free open source programs like OpenOffice, Thunderbird, etc.) Overall, you spend less money on software with Macs.

4. Looks cool. During my last major jury trial, the lead trial attorney did all our exhibits from his iPad. We polled the jury afterwards, and they said the iPad made us look modern and they liked the presentation. YA RLY. After that, my former (and still current) firm made almost a complete switch to Apple. (of course, I did a hearing last week off my iPad and I think the judge thought perhaps I was trying to be a little “too hip”.) Our non-scientific research has shown that people think Apple products are cool.

5. Macs are capable of producing great looking documents. If you haven’t read Typography for Lawyers, you should consider it. When Leo first made me read it, I laughed at him. “That is the stupidest idea ever.” Until weΒ integratedΒ it into our practice and judges and clerks started commenting on how professional, polished, and easy to read our papers come off.

6. iOS / OSX is so much better than Windows 7. It runs better, I don’t have a virus scanner installed, and it never freezes on me. It’s intuitive and it works well. Windows 7 is still clunky, it’s hard to find stuff, etc. TheΒ integrationΒ between iOS and OSX is incredible. Apples also don’t come pre-loaded with a bunch of crap on them or spyware. Using my Mac is a pleasure, but using my PC is “Ugh, this is so clunky… why doesn’t it have the cascade feature???”

7. A lot of the publishing companies have started to make the books you actually need available on your iPad. This is great if you don’t want to lug around the Rules of Evidence, Rules of Civil Procedure, and local rules with you every time you have to go to court.

The disadvantages of running your practice on Apple.

1. Collaboration. If you do a lot of collaborative work with others, most of them will not have Pages. You’ll be drafting stuff in one format and then converting it to another. At the very least, you will either need to have OpenOffice or MS Word installed on your Mac in order to collaborate.

2. Macs are expensive and difficult to upgrade. My laptop is a PC. It cost me about $800 and it’s totally souped up. My iMac cost considerably more and there is a limit to how much RAM I can add to it. iMacs are expensive and they become obsolete after about four or five years. There isn’t anything you can do about it, either. PCs are easier and cheaper to upgrade, buy parts for, etc.

3. Proprietary software is kind of a bummer. For instance, we use “Billings” for timekeeping and billing. It’s a great program, but it’s not available for the PC. For me, this means I can’t bill at home.

4. You still need access to a PC. There are many programs, some court or practice specific, that will require you to have a PC. At the very least, you will need access to one.

5. There are still some websites that require you to have Internet Explorer, the worst browser ever. You can’t use Explorer on a Mac, though. (Firefox is the best alternative).

6. If you use case management software (we don’t), some of the non-cloud based programs still require a PC. For instance, I don’t think Needles is available on Mac.

7. There are rarely times you’ll find yourself saying “Damn, I wish that program was available for PC.” Having a PC will rarely put you at a disadvantage.

In closing…

You can run a law practice with a yellow pad and a hard calendar very effectively. Same with a Mac or a PC. There are advantages and disadvantages to both.

Apple is great if you want your entire practiceΒ integratedΒ with your phone and your iPad, and you’re willing to pay a few extra bucks. But the advantages of Apple aren’t so great that your practice will instantly become infused with awesome for making the switch, either. You’ll never find yourself at aΒ disadvantage for being PC based.

Personally,Β I prefer Apple because it’s easy and intuitive. But your mileageΒ may vary.

6 Responses to Should I run my law firm on Apple? (a stupid post Greenfield and Tannebaum will laugh at)

  1. Max Kennerly says:

    Needles and Worldox were put on this Earth by the Devil to punish lawyers.

  2. […] Win Trials Jordan Rushie asks (rhetorically), Should I run my law firm on Apple? (a stupid post Greenfield and Tannebaum will laugh at), and compares this question to […]

  3. Alan Edmunds says:

    Great post and I’m actually surprised that someone asked this question. I have an iPad and an older iPhone, but I use a PC for all of my computing needs.
    iMacs are just expensive and there’s no point in buying them. I like the idea of modern isn’t though, I’ll have to try that though.

  4. Ric Moore says:

    You should try Linux on a PC. It’ll run the wheels off of a Mac or a Windows PC. That is the defintion of KEWL!

  5. I have to disagree about Macs being more expensive. Most lawyers are not that tech-capable and employ at least a contract “IT guy”. When you factor in the cost of that guy and the resale/trade in value of the typical 3 year old Apple product, Macs are actually more affordable. You simply won’t need the IT guy.
    As for needing to have a PC around, why? I’ve been running an all Mac office for over 15 years as a trial attorney. The last 4 I’ve been paperless. I’ve never needed a PC for anything other than a door stop.

  6. evilpaul says:

    You can always install (or have the tech guy do it) Bootcamp on your Mac and just boot up Windows 7 when you need to use

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: